August 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 23861] New: Add authorised value categories description option
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 08 Oct '26

08 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23861 Bug ID: 23861 Summary: Add authorised value categories description option Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com I really like the way the authorised values page looks now. I think it's much more user friendly with the descriptions and the categories all laid out and not in a drop-down. Right now, the descriptions for each category are "hardcoded" in the template. Would it be feasible to move those in the DB? That way, when we add new categories, we would be able to add our own description. For example, if I add a category for RDA media type, I would be able to add a description saying it's meant to be used with 337$a. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 35337] New: Patron flags should be transitioned over to restrictions
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Oct '26

07 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35337 Bug ID: 35337 Summary: Patron flags should be transitioned over to restrictions Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com The existence of patron flags seem arbitrary, like leftovers from before restrictions. It seems like you could accomplish the same thing with just restrictions. I would suggest removal of the flags, and incorporate a Authorized Value that could be customized with preset restrictions, including the former flags. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 35754] New: Place multiple item-group holds at once for the same record
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Oct '26

07 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35754 Bug ID: 35754 Summary: Place multiple item-group holds at once for the same record Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jzairo(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com With the availability for item-groups and item group holds it make it very easy for patrons to place a hold on a group of items. This enhancement would provide an option to place multiple item-group holds for the same record. An example use case could be a patron wants to place a hold on volume 4, 5, and 6. Current behavior requires the user to place a hold for vol 4, then place another for vol 5, then finally place a hold for vol 6. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 17

[Bug 40157] New: OAI's CSS should be updated to Bootstrap 5
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Oct '26

07 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40157 Bug ID: 40157 Summary: OAI's CSS should be updated to Bootstrap 5 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The current files are dated (bootstrap 3) and contain http links to fonts which cause the OAI page to be displayed as insecure. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 20638] New: Log actions on API keys
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Oct '26

07 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20638 Bug ID: 20638 Summary: Log actions on API keys Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Actions on API keys shoudl be logged and auditable (i.e. who creates the API keys, who revokes, etc). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 98

[Bug 38655] New: e-books (PDF) to be readable only to authenticated users, Stop download and Print
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Oct '26

07 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38655 Bug ID: 38655 Summary: e-books (PDF) to be readable only to authenticated users, Stop download and Print Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: new feature Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: ujkhatry(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Dear Koha friends, I have a request from a small library. They would like their e-books to be readable only to authenticated users…. The user should not be able to download, print or save the PDF locally. This is to stop the one authenticated users from distributing a e-book among friends. I have searched and searched in Koha and it seems we don’t have such controls. It would be wonderful if the Koha community could guide me on this. Thanks, Ujwal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 26

[Bug 39299] New: cn_browser on 952$o fails to open from item editor
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Oct '26

07 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39299 Bug ID: 39299 Summary: cn_browser on 952$o fails to open from item editor Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Since bug 30975 if you set the cn_browser plugin for 952$o it fails to open in the item editor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 21

[Bug 35143] New: Add hooks for status changes to ILL requests to send_staff_notice
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Oct '26

07 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35143 Bug ID: 35143 Summary: Add hooks for status changes to ILL requests to send_staff_notice Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: philip.orr(a)lmscloud.de CC: pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com If the library is using ILL, currently Email notifications can only be (automatically) sent to ILL staff when a patron makes a request to modify or cancel an existing request. The notice templates for those two cases are ILL_REQUEST_CANCEL and ILL_REQUEST_MODIFIED. It would be great if there was also a possibility to automatically send a mail to staff when a patron first creates a request. As ashimema said (paraphrasing here): it would be good to generally add hooks and tie them to the status field so that any status change of an ILL request triggers the corresponding ILL_REQUEST_NEWSTATUS notice if it exists (where NEWSTATUS stands for the new status after the status has changed). Some status changes for instance: ILL_REQUEST_NEW -> sent when request is first created. ILL_REQUEST_CANCEL -> same as it is now, sent when patron wishes to cancel a request ILL_REQUEST_IN_DELIVERY -> sent when status changes to "in delivery". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 36702] New: Background Jobs:Add option to retry failed jobs with a max tries parameter
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Oct '26

07 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36702 Bug ID: 36702 Summary: Background Jobs:Add option to retry failed jobs with a max tries parameter Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lisette.scheer(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Currently the background jobs just fail. It would be helpful if there was a path to add or set background jobs with a parameter to retry x times (probably with a y seconds interval between?) especially now that plugins can add background jobs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 57

[Bug 17787] New: Suppressed items seems so still be included in number of search results
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Oct '26

07 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17787 Bug ID: 17787 Summary: Suppressed items seems so still be included in number of search results Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: viktor.sarge(a)regionhalland.se QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We have a use case where like 99% of the collection is hidden and only a few selected items are displayed in the opac (by showing their covers up front on the main page). When going to the detail page and clicking the link for an author that has a long list of records (but only one visible in the opac) I might get indication of 63 hits in the search results and a the links to pages 1,2,3 etc for search results. Only problem is that there is actually only one result since the rest are suppressed. My guess is that the code calculating the number of hits and creating links to the pages of search results is not talking to the suppression system. I could not find any open bugs about this. Perhaps because our use of suppression is a bit of a edge case(?) I ended up "solving" the problem by removing the links on author etc. since we don't use search anyhow. I'll likely not research the issue further, but I felt I should at least report it and keep an eye out. All input is welcome. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 30