August 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 35612] New: Branchcode information for all customer fees lines
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Oct '26

30 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35612 Bug ID: 35612 Summary: Branchcode information for all customer fees lines Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pirkko-liisa.lauhikari(a)ouka.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We would like to have branchcode recorded to the OVERDUE fees in accountlines table. Configurability is desired, so that it is possible to choose which library is recorded. Options could be customer's home library, issuing library and item's home library. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 82

[Bug 39419] New: Holds API treats 'expiration_date' as 'patron_expiration_date'
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39419 Bug ID: 39419 Summary: Holds API treats 'expiration_date' as 'patron_expiration_date' Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com This is going to have a related issue in Aspen, but I think the confusion starts here Koha has two fields for hold expiration: expirationdate - (usually) auto generated date set based no when holds on the shelf expire patron_exiration_date - the day the patron says they don't need the hold after The API takes "expiration_date" and maps it to "patron_expiration_date" This can be unclear for outside systems. Aspen has a 'Default Not Needed After Days' setting which is assumed to be setting the automatic expiraton date, but in fact sets the patron date We should allow either field to be set via the API -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 110

[Bug 39160] New: Mojolicious::Plugin::OAuth2 is loaded suboptimally
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39160 Bug ID: 39160 Summary: Mojolicious::Plugin::OAuth2 is loaded suboptimally Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org This is a deep cut, but the following line is not optimal: $self->plugin( 'Mojolicious::Plugin::OAuth2' => $oauth_configuration ); Mojolicious will first try to load that as Mojolicious::Plugin::Mojolicious::Plugin::OAuth2 before it realises that we've already loaded Mojolicious::Plugin::OAuth2 earlier in Koha::REST::V1. I reckon that should say: $self->plugin( 'OAuth2' => $oauth_configuration ); -- In the grand scheme of things, it's not a big deal, but we can save ourselves 26 system calls by changing 1 line. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 26

[Bug 32542] New: Coce images not appearing in staff client
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32542 Bug ID: 32542 Summary: Coce images not appearing in staff client Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl To recreate: 1. Have Coce on, use 'https://coce.bywatersolututions.com' as the CoceProviders if needed. Select all providers 2. Turn on IntranetCoce and OpacCoce. 3. Do a OPAC search to retrieve some Coce images on both the OPAC results page and detail. 4. Do the same search and look at the same detail pages in the staff client. Nothing appears. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 45

[Bug 38181] New: Extreme slow search results on OPAC (only) search when result records contain multiple items.
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38181 Bug ID: 38181 Summary: Extreme slow search results on OPAC (only) search when result records contain multiple items. Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 24.05 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kdask(a)altsol.gr QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When performing a search on the OPAC, if the results containing records that are having a large number of holdings (e.g serials with over 1000 issues/items or even less) there is a huge delay on showing the results (~x8 times slower for the same search if we remove the multiple items from the resulting records) The odd is that the exact same search on the intranet interface works without these delays so I'm guessing that this is a problem on the OPAC search implementation? The problem exists with zebra but also with the use of Elasticsearch engine. Using elasticsearch tried also removing all the item related indexes - 952* subfields (and re-indexing) but the result is the same. In the following google drive link you can find a demo bib record with 1809 items (MarcXML - Marc21) if it helps to reproduce it.https://drive.google.com/file/d/11SQmfdWal9tzcovS0mrgu6vIOPf1aCbc/view You will have to import the record, and then try searching for the title on OPAC: The Journal of biological chemistry. In my case with a decent server without load (Debian, 4cpu cores, 16gb RAM) with plack enabled takes about ~50sec to get the result. Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 50

[Bug 40146] New: Untranslatable actions on vendor
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40146 Bug ID: 40146 Summary: Untranslatable actions on vendor Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 25.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: inkeri.hakulinen+bugz(a)helsinki.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Missing translations on some acquisitions-related words in version 25.05 1. Choose some language other than English 2. Go to Acquisitions 3. Search for a vendor and choose one. 4. When on vendor page, choose dropdown-menu from "+New" 5. You see following options: "Basket"*, "Contract"* and "Vendor". The two first are always in English, though "Vendor" is translated". In Finnish Koha community, we couldn't find an untranslated phrase from Weblate for the begininning of the dropdown-menu. I also tested Admin Kuhn's demo Koha 25.05 at https://koha-community.org/demo/ They have English and German languages installed there, but these translations were missing from there, too. Can someone please add these terms to be translatable? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 33260] New: Show message queue on staff interface and make notices printable
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33260 Bug ID: 33260 Summary: Show message queue on staff interface and make notices printable Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: aleisha(a)catalyst.net.nz QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Some Koha libraries need to get messages out to borrowers who do not have email addresses, so they need to be able to view generated notices, and optionally print them so they can be delivered offline. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 669

[Bug 36506] New: Processing Fee should be configurable by branch
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36506 Bug ID: 36506 Summary: Processing Fee should be configurable by branch Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lisette.scheer(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org In a consortia environment, some branches might want a process fee and others might not. This could be worked around with multiple item types, but that can cause other issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 76

[Bug 39890] New: Accessibility: Add more Bypass blocks to the OPAC.
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39890 Bug ID: 39890 Summary: Accessibility: Add more Bypass blocks to the OPAC. Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Accessibility Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nina.martinez(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: martin.renvoize(a)openfifth.co.uk, matt.blenkinsop(a)openfifth.co.uk, oleonard(a)myacpl.org To improve the Opac accessibility, we can add more bypass blocks to facilitate keyboard navigation (WCAG 2.4.1). Currently, we have one bypass for 'skip to the main content.' We could also add a bypass to skip to the footer, to skip to the search and to skip to the menu for pages that have one. https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/bypass-blocks.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 36

[Bug 39420] New: Item edit breadcrumbs wrong
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39420 Bug ID: 39420 Summary: Item edit breadcrumbs wrong Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When you open a record detail view, this is the breadcrumb: ``` Home / Catalog / The title / Details ``` If you choose to edit its items, the breadcrumb becomes: ``` Home / Cataloging / Edit The title (Record # NN) / Items ``` So you cannot actually use the breadcrumb to go back to the detail page for the record, but instead you go to the MARC editor. I believe it should be like this instead: ``` Home / Catalog / The title / Edit items ``` If we wanted to have a shortcut for editing the MARC record, I would add a link in the breadcrumb like this: ``` Home / Catalog / The title ([edit](/the/url))/ Edit items ``` But, right now, it is super weird. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 17