August 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 39865] New: Consider updating OpenLibrary covers search API
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Sep '26

29 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39865 Bug ID: 39865 Summary: Consider updating OpenLibrary covers search API Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 24.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oliver.behnke(a)aei.mpg.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Koha currently uses OpenLibrary's "Legacy Book API" [1] to fetch book covers which "is a legacy endpoint and may be phased out in the future". Also, it's inefficient. The replacement seems to be the dedicated "Covers API" [2]. One drawback, though, it's currently rate limited to 100 requests per IP per five minutes. That might quickly be exhausted on the OPAC search result page. Thanks [1] https://openlibrary.org/dev/docs/api/books [2] https://openlibrary.org/dev/docs/api/covers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 29733] New: MARC21: Link 7xx linking fields to marc21_linking_section.pl value builder in sample frameworks
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Sep '26

29 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29733 Bug ID: 29733 Summary: MARC21: Link 7xx linking fields to marc21_linking_section.pl value builder in sample frameworks Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Bibliographic data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We do link the authority controlled fields to the authority linker by default, so it would make sense to link the fields used for linking between bibliographic records to the available helper plugin as well. At the moment the plugin is not well know, although it provides a great functionality, this could help advertise and improve it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 30303] New: Add ability to select which values to retain when merging patrons
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Sep '26

29 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30303 Bug ID: 30303 Summary: Add ability to select which values to retain when merging patrons Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com When merging two patron records, one simply picks one record to retain values from. It would be helpful to have an interface more like what we see when merging biblio records, where one can select values from either pre-merge record to be retained post-merge. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 63

[Bug 35333] New: Koha::Patron->add_guarantor not checking anything
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Sep '26

29 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35333 Bug ID: 35333 Summary: Koha::Patron->add_guarantor not checking anything Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org This method should receive a `guarantor` parameter, and check if it is a valid guarantor, the same way we later check when saving patrons that the guaratonrs are valid (which I think was put in the wrong place). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 24608] New: Allow modification of checkout due date
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Sep '26

28 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24608 Bug ID: 24608 Summary: Allow modification of checkout due date Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew.isherwood(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Currently it is not possible to modify a checkout's due date. This bug proposes to allow such an action. It is only proposed to allow modification of a due date *forward* at this stage as moving a due date backwards may involve additional complication that will require further thought. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 71

[Bug 40252] New: Create dedicated ILL_HOLD_SLIP
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Sep '26

28 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40252 Bug ID: 40252 Summary: Create dedicated ILL_HOLD_SLIP Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: lisette(a)bywatersolutions.com, pedro.amorim(a)openfifth.co.uk, tomascohen(a)gmail.com Many ILL backends tie an ILL request to a hold in Koha. In these cases, libraries generally want to print a distinct HOLD_SLIP for holds associated with ILL requests. This leads to long and complicated HOLD_SLIPs. We'd like to teach Koha to use a new distinct slip when a hold has an illrequest associated with it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 35066] New: In the Holds Queue, add ability to decline to fill a hold and automatically push to the next branch
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Sep '26

28 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35066 Bug ID: 35066 Summary: In the Holds Queue, add ability to decline to fill a hold and automatically push to the next branch Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 22.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: catrina(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com For libraries using the holds queue, they should have the ability to deny filling the hold so it would push the item onto the next branch's holds queue without having to wait for the cron to run. Right now, the only way to move an item off a library's queue is to mark it as missing/lost or damaged. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 36930] New: Item search gives irrelevant results when using 2+ added filter criteria
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Sep '26

28 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36930 Bug ID: 36930 Summary: Item search gives irrelevant results when using 2+ added filter criteria Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff interface Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: januszop(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com In the Item search a librarian is allowed, in the first step, to define additional filters like Title, Author, Publisher, Publication date etc. (the third fieldset). This works fine but only for one criterion. If one adds two or more criteria, the filter does not apply at all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 26

[Bug 36164] New: Bring more consistency to our module landing pages
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Sep '26

28 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36164 Bug ID: 36164 Summary: Bring more consistency to our module landing pages Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff interface Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Koha's modules have a variety of landing page designs. We should try to move to a more consistent approach across landing pages. This bug serves as a collector for such work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 20

[Bug 21482] New: Create a "landing page" for ILL
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Sep '26

28 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21482 Bug ID: 21482 Summary: Create a "landing page" for ILL Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: magnus(a)libriotech.no Currently, when you go to the ILL module, the first iew is of all ILL requests. This can be a lot of data, and take several seconds to load, and I doubt a lot of people will want the full list. So maybe we could have some sort of intermediate page with links to selections of request, based on their status, type etc. At it's simplest this could just be a page that displays the contents of a syspref, and that syspref could then be filled with HTML and links to filtered views of ILL requests. If the syspref is empty, the intermediate page could redirect to the full view, as it is today. A more advanced version would have a GUI to configure the links, order them, give them names etc. Thougts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 19