February 2026 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 40846] New: Job Status should not be Failed if a record import result in a item update
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Jul '26

16 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40846 Bug ID: 40846 Summary: Job Status should not be Failed if a record import result in a item update Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: mathsabypro(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org If you import staged records with the sole purpose of updating the items (Action if matching record found: = Ignore incoming record ; Action if no match is found:Ignore incoming record ; Check for embedded item record data = Yes ; How to process items = Replace items if ...), at the end of the operation Koha display " Failed" job status. If the items were successfully updted, the status should be Success -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 18410] New: Koha should use cool URIs
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Jul '26

16 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18410 Bug ID: 18410 Summary: Koha should use cool URIs Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: pablo.bianchi(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Right now Koha use a very volatile URI scheme. If we seek having not ephemeral URIs they should be completely different. Take a look to this article from 1998 of a guy called Tim Berners-Lee: "Cool URIs don't change" https://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI A normal Koha URI looks like this: https://catalog.bywatersolutions.com/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumb… This URI is doomed to die in the short term, is not designed thinking in long-term. We have a lot of information about the tools and technical things used to put it there, like "cgi-bin", "koha" and "pl". Is not even consistent about using always en_US (american English): "/cgi-bin/koha/cataloguing/addbooks.pl" (cataloguing != cataloging). As the article say we shouldn't forget about domain name. We could encourage the use of more permanent words like "catalog" for the host part of the FQDN. PS: This may be related to the robust RESTful URI. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 39714] New: Optionally do not count waiting or suspended holds toward hold limits
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Jul '26

15 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39714 Bug ID: 39714 Summary: Optionally do not count waiting or suspended holds toward hold limits Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com When enforcing how many holds a patron is allowed, some libraries would prefer not to count waiting or suspended holds. We could add a system preference that allows one to configure which hold statuses to count toward limits. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 25667] New: Add field for items.notforloan_on to record when a notforloan status is applied
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Jul '26

15 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25667 Bug ID: 25667 Summary: Add field for items.notforloan_on to record when a notforloan status is applied Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Database Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We record lost_on and damaged_on. Can we record notforloan_on, too? It'd be helpful for various reports. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 14

[Bug 35693] New: Granular Permissions to Everything
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Jul '26

15 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35693 Bug ID: 35693 Summary: Granular Permissions to Everything Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com I don't know exactly how to file this. Koha is growing all the time and new features are always being added, but they are often being added with very little permission granularity. Often the permissions are too broad. For example, the newer pages under additional-contents.pl is under the entire umbrella of one permission for the user, and gives them access to ALL pages, ALL news, and ALL HTML customizations. I am hoping that Koha will start thinking more about roles in the library, and allowing us to give specific people access to specific pages, customizations, etc. This goes even further with who can override things. We don't have a lot of control over who can do what specific things. Maybe there is a bug on this topic already? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 26

[Bug 38666] New: New feature: closed stack requests
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Jul '26

15 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38666 Bug ID: 38666 Summary: New feature: closed stack requests Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: new feature Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com Reporter: julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com A closed stack request is a special kind of hold that can only be placed on a closed stack item. A closed stack item is an item that is not available publicly in the library but can be made available on demand. When a request is made, a librarian will print a slip then will go retrieve the document and place the slip in place of the document. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 85

[Bug 41959] New: Holds queue builder doesn't always check all holds when using transport cost matrix
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Jul '26

15 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41959 Bug ID: 41959 Summary: Holds queue builder doesn't always check all holds when using transport cost matrix Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, lisette(a)bywatersolutions.com, tomascohen(a)gmail.com The scenario presented itself under a specific circumstance Library A ordered a copy of a book and left in 'on order' status Library B purchased a copy and made it available Each library can only fill holds on their own items The transport cost matrix only allows items to transfer to their own branch The transfer limits only allows items to transfer to their own branch A patron of Library A places a title level hold, it can't fill because library A's item is unavailable (on order) A patron of Library B places a title level hold, it should be queued for library B's item In C4::HoldsQueue::MapItemsToHoldRequests we call _allocateWithTransportCostMatrix In _allocateWithTranportCostMatrix we have this code: if ( $num_tasks > $num_agents ) { @remaining = @requests[ $num_agents .. $num_tasks - 1 ]; @requests = @requests[ 0 .. $num_agents - 1 ]; $num_tasks = $num_agents; } task = requests and agents = items In our scenario - 2 tasks/requests and 1 item/agent The code above drops the second request, and sets tasks to 1 We then loop tasks and agents: for ( my $i = 0 ; $i < $num_agents ; $i++ ) { for ( my $j = $r ; $j < $num_tasks ; $j++ ) { But since we have dcereased things above, we only check the first task/request - the second hold, which should be filled, is never checked -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 27

[Bug 34626] New: Add waiting since date to holdswaiting patron message
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Jul '26

14 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34626 Bug ID: 34626 Summary: Add waiting since date to holdswaiting patron message Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com On moremember.tt and ciculation.tt there will be a message if the patron has any waiting holds. This message displays the date the hold was placed on (reserves.reservedate) and the date it will wait until ( reservedate.expirationdate ). Some libraries would like to add the 'Waiting since' date. ( reservedate.waitingdate ) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 14

[Bug 41702] New: Update MARC21 authority frameworks to Update 41 (December 2025)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Jul '26

14 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41702 Bug ID: 41702 Summary: Update MARC21 authority frameworks to Update 41 (December 2025) Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org https://www.loc.gov/marc/authority/adapndxf.html UPDATE 41 CHANGES ■ New content designators: Subfields $i Relationship information (R) in 368 (Other Attributes of Person or Corporate Body) $i Relationship information (R) in 376 (Family Information) $i Relationship information (R) in 381 (Other Distinguishing Characteristics of Work or Expression) $4 Relationship (R) in 368 (Other Attributes of Person or Corporate Body) $4 Relationship (R) in 376 (Family Information) $4 Relationship (R) in 381 (Other Distinguishing Characteristics of Work or Expression) ■ Changes in content designator names and definitions: Subfield $2 Source redescribed in 368 (Other Attributes of Person or Corporate Body) Appendix HData Provenance Subfields: Data Provenance Code List moved to https://www.loc.gov/standards/valuelist/dataprov.html. New codes bcp47 and dpets added. ■ Fast-track changes: Subfields $g Conversion date renamed Conversion date/time and redescribed in 884 (Description Conversion Information) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 41479] New: Remove Baker & Taylor integration
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Jul '26

14 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41479 Bug ID: 41479 Summary: Remove Baker & Taylor integration Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Baker & Taylor will soon be no more: https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/publisher-news/a… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 37