July 2026 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 40712] New: cookieConsent: Accepting essential cookies is unneeded/misleading
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40712 Bug ID: 40712 Summary: cookieConsent: Accepting essential cookies is unneeded/misleading Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org It feels a bit strange to Accept essential cookies. If you dont accept, they work anyway. And if you can accept, you would expect a reject either. But you cant reject them: they are essential and the code just uses them. If there are no additional non-essential cookies, it feels like the bar just needs a OK button to dismiss a message that there are only essential cookies. (This dismissal is not an accept.) "Under GDPR, essential (or strictly necessary) cookies are exempt from requiring user consent because they are fundamental for basic website functionality." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 41291] New: Add ability to have multiple self registration forms
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41291 Bug ID: 41291 Summary: Add ability to have multiple self registration forms Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Some libraries require multiple self registration forms with different visible fields and different required fields. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 41722] New: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>)... warnings in opac-detail.tt
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41722 Bug ID: 41722 Summary: Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>)... warnings in opac-detail.tt Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: roman.dolny(a)jezuici.pl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The warning: [WARN] Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric gt (>) at /kohadevbox/koha/koha-tmpl/opac-tmpl/bootstrap/en/modules/opac-detail.tt line 1578. appears in the plack-opac-error.log. It is quite strange because warning only appears when opac-detail.pl is used for very first time to show record. To reproduce: 1a. Use a fresh KTD or 1b. edit opac-detail.tt (save an insignificant change, like add a space) and restart plack. 2. Observe plack-opac-error.log. 3. Go to any bibliographic record with items in OPAC., e.g. search for "Perl template toolkit". ==> Warnings should appear in plack-opac-error.log ==> (as many as there are items). 4. Restart plack 5. Back to OPAC and refresh view of bibliographic record. ==> No warnings appear. 5. Repeat 1b., 4. and 5. ==> Warnings appear. It seems that check of existens "item_level_holds" is needed before using it in IF condition, but I can't find why warning appers in log only once, not every time when "item_level_holds" is checked in IF. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 41756] New: RSS feed validation
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41756 Bug ID: 41756 Summary: RSS feed validation Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: nicolas.hunstein(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When I perform a search in Koha, click on the RSS feed button, copy the generated string and then validate it on the page: https://www.rssboard.org/rss-validator/, I get the message: "It looks like this is a web page, not a feed. I looked for a feed associated with this page, but couldn't find one. Please enter the address of your feed to validate." Could this please be fixed? We suspect that there is a problem with the content type. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 11

[Bug 42854] New: OPAC self-checkout does not handle items that are in transit
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42854 Bug ID: 42854 Summary: OPAC self-checkout does not handle items that are in transit Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)openfifth.co.uk QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Blocks: 42851 Target Milestone: --- Split off from bug 42851. opac/sco/sco-main.pl:180 calls AddReturn and only inspects $success; it does not consider that the item may be in transit. The transfer-on-checkout logic in C4/Circulation.pm:1754-1771 force-closes a transfer when an item is issued via the staff client, but the SCO path needs explicit, considered handling. Open questions to resolve on this bug: - Should we BLOCK self-checkout of an item that is in transit? - If we allow the checkout, we must still do something sensible with the transfer, because there is still an expectation the item eventually reaches the original destination branch. Test plan: 1. Transfer an item from A to B (in transit). 2. Attempt to self-check-out the item at branch C via OPAC SCO. 3. Define and verify the agreed behaviour (block, or allow + handle the open transfer). Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42851 [Bug 42851] [OMNIBUS] Items left stuck in transit when checked in outside the staff returns page -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 38196] New: Filter out concerns by specific status does not include concern without status
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38196 Bug ID: 38196 Summary: Filter out concerns by specific status does not include concern without status Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Depends on: 35628 You can filter out concerns by status (ie. linked with TICKET_STATUS AV). But if you use this "Filter" link on top of the page to remove the concerns with this specific status, it will also remove the concerns without a specific status. concern 1 | Open concern 2 | Resolved concern 3 | status_1 concern 4 | status_2 "Filter status_1" should remove concern 3 only. However it will only show concern 4. This is because the query is ([-and => {status => { '!=' => "status_1" }}]) And does not include status that are NULL in DB. use Koha::Tickets; my $t = Koha::Tickets->search; say $_->status // "undefined" for $t->as_list; say "==="; $t = Koha::Tickets->search([-and => {status => { '!=' => "status_1" }}]); say $_->status for $t->as_list; undefined undefined status_1 status_2 === status_2 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35628 [Bug 35628] Add optional statuses to catalog concerns -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 36

[Bug 42577] New: Gettext.js incorrectly located and tidied
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42577 Bug ID: 42577 Summary: Gettext.js incorrectly located and tidied Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org If you look at opac-tmpl/bootstrap/js/Gettext.js or its intranet-tmpl equivalent, you'll notice that it's actually a third-party script and not a Koha script, so it should be in the "lib" folder and the license for it should be added to about.tt We've also tidied the file because it wasn't in "lib"... so we might want to undo that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 42541] New: Add order and serial controls before moving items
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42541 Bug ID: 42541 Summary: Add order and serial controls before moving items Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: thibaud.guillot(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com Hello, Following on from patch 6532, I have added checks for orders and serials to confirm the move after a modal has been displayed if an order or serial number is linked. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 41664] New: Moving an item from record A to record B should update OAI modification date of record A
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41664 Bug ID: 41664 Summary: Moving an item from record A to record B should update OAI modification date of record A Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Web services Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: mathsabypro(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Deleting an item from a record updates the modification date of the record's header in OAI-PMH repository. But moving an item from record A to record B does not currently update that date. It should be, as we are resting on that piece of information to pass on the changes to external systems harvesting Koha. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 35142] New: Koha::Util::oclc_number should be removed in favor of Koha::Biblio::Metadata::Extractor
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35142 Bug ID: 35142 Summary: Koha::Util::oclc_number should be removed in favor of Koha::Biblio::Metadata::Extractor Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 30678, 34828 See bug 34828. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30678 [Bug 30678] Add OCLC_NO as option to OPACSearchForTitleIn https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34828 [Bug 34828] Add Koha::Biblio::Metadata::Extractor* classes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 44