June 2016 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 11490] MaxItemsForBatch should be split into two new prefs
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Jun '16

17 Jun '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11490 Kyle M Hall <kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Passed QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15108] OAI-PMH provider improvements
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Jun '16

17 Jun '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15108 --- Comment #38 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- include_items option ... is what I meant :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 16577] New: Improve call number browser plugin
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Jun '16

17 Jun '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16577 Bug ID: 16577 Summary: Improve call number browser plugin Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All URL: /cgi-bin/koha/cataloguing/plugin_launcher.pl?plugin_na me=cn_browser.pl&popup&q=X OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Bug 13364 added a call number browser cataloging plugin which can be used to check for duplicate call numbers when adding an item. I have several markup fixes and style improvements for the template. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 10

[Bug 10472] Receipt by line or invoice
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Jun '16

17 Jun '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10472 Paul Poulain <paul.poulain(a)biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |Needs Signoff CC| |paul.poulain(a)biblibre.com --- Comment #5 from Paul Poulain <paul.poulain(a)biblibre.com> --- probably a lost in limbo patch... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15296] MEMBER logging in action_logs does not give enough detail.
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Jun '16

17 Jun '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15296 --- Comment #1 from Barton Chittenden <barton(a)bywatersolutions.com> --- (In reply to Barton Chittenden from comment #0) > 'action' fields -- I really needed to know which fields in the borrower > record were changed. ... as well as what the field changed from and to. I *don't* want to see the entire borrower record though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 6906] show 'Borrower has previously issued $ITEM' alert on checkout
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Jun '16

17 Jun '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6906 Kyle M Hall <kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com Status|Passed QA |Failed QA --- Comment #48 from Kyle M Hall <kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com> --- I'm getting 8 failing subtests out of 59. Also, please rename the method wantsCheckPrevCheckout to something like should_check_for_previous_checkout and doCheckPrevCheckout to check_for_previous_checkout. As per the Koha Objects pages linked from the Coding Guidelines, all Koha::Object(s) derived classes should use snake case. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 9810] Search limit 'available' does not hide damaged, withdrawn, or not-for-loan items
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Jun '16

17 Jun '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9810 Nick Clemens <nick(a)bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nick(a)bywatersolutions.com Summary|Search limit 'available' |Search limit 'available' |does not hide damaged or |does not hide damaged, |withdrawn items |withdrawn, or not-for-loan | |items -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15108] OAI-PMH provider improvements
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Jun '16

17 Jun '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15108 Mirko Tietgen <mirko(a)abunchofthings.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mirko(a)abunchofthings.net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 10459] borrowers should have a timestamp
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Jun '16

17 Jun '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10459 Kyle M Hall <kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Passed QA |Pushed to Stable --- Comment #77 from Kyle M Hall <kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com> --- I think we're all fixed up on this one! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15108] OAI-PMH provider improvements
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Jun '16

17 Jun '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15108 --- Comment #37 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- Hm, reading through the use cases Frederic wrote I wonder if it wouldn't work for a first step if we say that the item changes should only be taken into account if you have the add_items flag set. And then we could open a separate bug for an enhanced mode, where only some changes lead to 'republishing' the record via OAI. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0