October 2022 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 23649] New: Elasticsearch offer an option to weight search results by type
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Sep '26

04 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23649 Bug ID: 23649 Summary: Elasticsearch offer an option to weight search results by type Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com Some libraries would like to be able to prioritize "books" over "large print" , audios, etc in the search results -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 46

[Bug 16207] New: Incorporate circulation and fine rules for library groups
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Sep '26

04 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16207 Bug ID: 16207 Summary: Incorporate circulation and fine rules for library groups Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com I think we could simplify circulation and fine rules by incorporating library groups into the mix. For example, I have 27 libraries, and 8 of them follow the same set of rules that are different from the defaults. So, what if instead of cloning these special rules to 8 different libraries (and who knows how many other duplicated sets of rules there are), we defined a set of rules for a library group. If the library is part of that group, it goes by those rules. I don't know if we want to use the same library groups that are already defined in the libraries and groups, or if we want to create a unique Circ rule group. Because, there is always the chance that one or more of the libraries in the 8 that are grouped together by affiliation or region could have a slightly different set of rules. However, I think rules by groups would make managing rules far less complicated than managing groups of cloned rules. Christopher -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 31963] New: Only show reserve fee message on OPAC if they will actually be charged
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31963 Bug ID: 31963 Summary: Only show reserve fee message on OPAC if they will actually be charged Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 22.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: aleisha(a)catalyst.net.nz QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Hold fees can be set at the patron-category level, and if a patron who could be charged a reserve fee logs into the OPAC and tries the place a hold, a message about being charged a hold fee will show. This message does not take HoldFeeMode into consideration. When HoldFeeMode is set to "any time a reserve is collected" the message will be "You will be charged a hold fee of $X when you collect this item", but if HoldFeeMode is set to anything else, the message will be what we are seeing "You will be charged a hold fee of $X for placing this hold". This message can be a bit unexpected, especially if HoldFeeMode is set so hold fees should only be charged if all items are checked out and the record has at least one hold already. We don't expect we should see the message if there are items available and no holds on the record, when HoldFeeMode is set this way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 23

[Bug 27428] New: Show the number of records in the bibliographic record detail page with ElasticSearch.
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27428 Bug ID: 27428 Summary: Show the number of records in the bibliographic record detail page with ElasticSearch. Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: ivan.dziuba(a)inlibro.com This preference only for OPAC to show the number of records next to search links in the bibliographic record detail page. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 107

[Bug 25870] New: Add a q_ccl query parameter to /biblios
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25870 Bug ID: 25870 Summary: Add a q_ccl query parameter to /biblios Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: REST API Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com It would be great if we could just pass a CCL query to the /biblios route -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 90

[Bug 27432] New: Add report run to action logs
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27432 Bug ID: 27432 Summary: Add report run to action logs Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Reports Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reports run should be logged in action logs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 79

[Bug 22994] New: Elasticsearch ability import mappings and facets settings
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22994 Bug ID: 22994 Summary: Elasticsearch ability import mappings and facets settings Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: black23(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 21

[Bug 24807] New: Add "year" type to improve sorting by publication date
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Sep '26

02 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24807 Bug ID: 24807 Summary: Add "year" type to improve sorting by publication date Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: glasklas(a)gmail.com When sorting on date-of-publication (a year, field 008, positions 7-10), the current behavior when the field contains an invalid year (containing word characters like "uuuu" or just whitespace), these results appear first when sorting in descending order. Invalid values like these should really not be indexed at all. If so (having null values instead) they will always appear last when sorting, regardless of sort order. This fix adds a "year" search field type, that will reject any non-year values, resulting in a more user friendly sorting behavior. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 70

[Bug 23333] New: Course Reserves: Instuctor search box positioning
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Sep '26

02 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23333 Bug ID: 23333 Summary: Course Reserves: Instuctor search box positioning Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff Client Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: claire_gravely(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Created attachment 91567 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=91567&action=ed… Screenshot When creating a new course in the course reserves module the "Instructor search" box is oddly positioned. Perhaps it could be moved more in line with 'Instructors'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 22456] New: Customers Cancelling their Pending Holds
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Sep '26

02 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22456 Bug ID: 22456 Summary: Customers Cancelling their Pending Holds Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 18.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: christofer.zorn(a)ajaxlibrary.ca QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- Good morning! I'm not sure if I should have piggybacked this off of the previous ticket, but I'd like to open the discussion on bug 18856 again. We'd like the ability to have patrons cancel their holds once they have been pulled by staff and are awaiting pick up. Our previous catalogue (Bibliocommons) allowed the cancellation of holds once it as captured. This feature was well like and used by our patrons who had determined they didn't need/want the item any longer. This gave the perception that they were freeing up the item for the next person. We have fielded a number of grumpy comments since our migration about the inability to perform this functionality. >From my perspective, if we're allowing patrons to place holds and cancel them before they're captured, we should offer the ability to cancel them up until they're picked up. At the very least, this should be a system option to allow the Library to choose whether they'd like to enable this functionality. Even if the implemented functionality is a placebo for the user ... offer them the ability to cancel the hold and have it remove from their account. As long as optically it appears they've cancelled the hold, there is no harm. If desired, a report could be run to allow staff to pull those items from the shelf if needed. I'm more than happy to elaborate if needed on this, but I feel that this is a feature that is currently missing from Koha that would be a boon to customer service. Thanks Christofer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 166