April 2022 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 26653] New: Allow editing of item notes on moredetail.pl with circulation permission
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 18 Dec '25

18 Dec '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26653 Bug ID: 26653 Summary: Allow editing of item notes on moredetail.pl with circulation permission Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl If a user has circulation permissions, they can edit the lost/damaged/withdrawn statuses of an item on moredetail.pl (the items tab in the catalog). However, they cannot edit the public and non-public notes for that item. Those notes are only editable on this if one also has edit_items permission, which opens up a lot more actions. I feel the editing of these notes from moredetail should also fall under circulation permissions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 15789] New: Split borrowers permission into create/edit
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 18 Dec '25

18 Dec '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15789 Bug ID: 15789 Summary: Split borrowers permission into create/edit Change sponsored?: Seeking cosponsors Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All URL: http://devs.bywatersolutions.com/projects/fine-overrid es/ OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nengard(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Goal: Add ability to control if an individual staff user can override checkout restriction based on noissuescharge Work to be done: 1) Add new permission allow_fine_override 2) Set new permission for existing staff members with setting for AllowFineOverride 3) Remove use of AllowFineOverride, replace with use of new permission allow_fine_override Looking for sponsors here: http://devs.bywatersolutions.com/projects/fine-overrides/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 20644] New: Per itemtype setting for CheckPrevCheckout
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Dec '25

17 Dec '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20644 Bug ID: 20644 Summary: Per itemtype setting for CheckPrevCheckout Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: magnus(a)libriotech.no QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Bug 6906 introduced the new CheckPrevCheckout syspref. The description says: "New feature: provide granular means to configure warnings about items that have been issued to a particular borrower before, according to their checkout history." I assume "items" here is shorthand for "items connected to the same bibliographic record"? Just checking on the item level would not be all that useful, if there are more than one copy of e.g. a book. On the other hand, this does not work so well for periodicals/journals where individual issues are entered as separate items. If a patron borrows the last three issues of a journal, the second one will give a warning that the patron has previously borrowed this "title". Could it be possible to have a setting on the itemtypes to choose one of these two? - Check if a patron has previously borrowed individual items (suitable for periodicals/journals) - Check if a patron has previously borrowed any items connected to a bib record (suitable for books, DVDs etc) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 124

[Bug 22861] New: Add ability to turn on/off the display of a public list
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Dec '25

17 Dec '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22861 Bug ID: 22861 Summary: Add ability to turn on/off the display of a public list Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 18.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Lists Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kelly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Target Milestone: --- Libraries use the Public List feature a lot for patrons to see them on the OPAC. It would be very nice to allow staff to disable/enable these public lists -as the Course Reserve module does -as needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 19917] New: Holds for self registered patrons
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Dec '25

17 Dec '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19917 Bug ID: 19917 Summary: Holds for self registered patrons Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com There needs to be a switch in place that does not allow a hold to be triggered if the hold is for a patron in the self registered category. Our library workflow: * Allows self registered patrons to place a couple of holds. * Doesn't assign an automatic card number. * Prints specialized hold slips * Allows self pickup Ideally, we would want the preference to not trigger the hold if the self registration category is in use on the patron with the hold, and a message to come up asking staff to go ahead and assign a card number, or something to that effect. Right now, when the hold is triggered, the slip comes out wrong because there is data missing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 20575] New: Auto-renewals to use current patron category when renewing as opposed to when item was issued.
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Dec '25

17 Dec '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20575 Bug ID: 20575 Summary: Auto-renewals to use current patron category when renewing as opposed to when item was issued. Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 17.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kelly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Increasing the functionality of the Auto=-renewal process to have Koha look at the circulation and fine rule table at time of renewal instead of keeping the same circ and fine rules when the item was issued. If a patron category has been changed during when an item has been checked out the patron, this is not reflected in the auto-renewal process. For example, if a student is allowed to auto renewal items but they are changed to a different patron category who can not auto-renewal-Koha will still allow the auto-renewal given the rules were set when the item was checked out. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 10

[Bug 30030] New: Test t/db_dependent/Koha/Patrons.t is_going_to_expire fails randomly
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Dec '25

14 Dec '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30030 Bug ID: 30030 Summary: Test t/db_dependent/Koha/Patrons.t is_going_to_expire fails randomly Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: chris(a)bigballofwax.co.nz Reporter: fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org See https://jenkins.koha-community.org/view/master/job/Koha_Master_U18/lastComp… not ok 9 - On invalid "is going to expire" date, the method should not crash with "Invalid local time for date in time zone" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 21

[Bug 30343] New: Any failed delivery method in overduerules.pl produces a printed notice in attachment.txt
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Dec '25

11 Dec '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30343 Bug ID: 30343 Summary: Any failed delivery method in overduerules.pl produces a printed notice in attachment.txt Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 21.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Previously we had only used the e-mail delivery method in overduerules.pl. This worked great. When a patron didn't have an e-mail address, a printed notice was added to the attachment.txt file for printed notices. Now we have phone and sms added as delivery methods. However, if ANY of these fail (no SMS number or no primary phone, or in the case of Twilio, if the same notice is sent via e-mail or sms, the phone status shows as deleted to prevent duplication) a printed notice is added to the attachment.txt file for printed notices. There should be option to determine if a printed notice is generated if ANY of the other methods fail, or if ALL of the methods fail. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 20338] New: Preference noissuescharge should not be considered 5 when it is actually 0
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 08 Dec '25

08 Dec '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20338 Bug ID: 20338 Summary: Preference noissuescharge should not be considered 5 when it is actually 0 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: josef.moravec(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com When the noissuescharge is set to 0, then limit 5 is used, see FIXME comment in circ/circulation.pl after bug 19933 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 25219] New: Include note in fines-related system preferences which can be disabled by leaving them blank
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 08 Dec '25

08 Dec '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25219 Bug ID: 25219 Summary: Include note in fines-related system preferences which can be disabled by leaving them blank Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com The syspref OPACFineNoRenewals includes the note "(leave blank to disable)." The sysprefs maxoutstanding, noissuescharge, NoIssuesChargeGuarantees, and MaxFine can all be disabled by leaving them blank, as well. It'd be helpful to include that same "(leave blank to disable)" message to make it clear. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 6