March 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 39255] New: Improve translation of title tags: OPAC part 4
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 May '26

24 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39255 Bug ID: 39255 Summary: Improve translation of title tags: OPAC part 4 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Blocks: 33906 This patch will modify the last batch of OPAC templates so that translatable strings in the <title> tag are wrapped in the correct translation function, e.g. [% t('Translate me') %] Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33906 [Bug 33906] [OMNIBUS] Improve translation of title tags -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 37024] New: Scrolling glitch on holdings table
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 May '26

24 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37024 Bug ID: 37024 Summary: Scrolling glitch on holdings table Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: Laura.escamilla(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Similar to bug 36291, the holdings table is also glitching during scrolling. I'm seeing the following message in the console log: "This site appears to use a scroll-linked positioning effect. This may not work well with asynchronous panning; see https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/performance/scroll-linked_effects.h… for further details and to join the discussion on related tools and features!" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 93

[Bug 34353] New: We don't need 'SpineLabelShowPrintOnBibDetails' anymore
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 May '26

24 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34353 Bug ID: 34353 Summary: We don't need 'SpineLabelShowPrintOnBibDetails' anymore Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff interface Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Surely we don't need this preference anymore.. one can enable/disable the option to display this button from the table settings page instead? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 27

[Bug 39158] New: Reduce code duplication in marc_records_to_documents
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 May '26

24 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39158 Bug ID: 39158 Summary: Reduce code duplication in marc_records_to_documents Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: glasklas(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org There is currently a block in Koha::SearchEngine::Elasticsearch::marc_records_to_documents that in my opinion should be brokwn out to its own method for increased maintainability and readability. It's easily done that these two blocks will drift apart with time (when they should be the same), fixing a bug in one place, forgetting in another etc. Here is a patch to fix this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 17

[Bug 36853] New: Enhance Elasticsearch Notes/Comments MARC21 index mappings
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 May '26

24 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36853 Bug ID: 36853 Summary: Enhance Elasticsearch Notes/Comments MARC21 index mappings Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: aleisha(a)catalyst.net.nz We would like to add the following tags and subfields to the existing note index for Elasticsearch MARC21, as used by the "Notes/Comments" advanced search dropdown option: * 501a * 503a * 504a * 508a * 511a * 521a * 538a * 547a * 591a * 592a * 593a * 594a * 595a * 596a * 597a * 598a * 599ab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 27

[Bug 37773] New: Cataloging search breadcrumb
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 May '26

24 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37773 Bug ID: 37773 Summary: Cataloging search breadcrumb Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jcortazar(a)artium.eus QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org In the Cataloging Search option in Koha, once the search is completed there is no way to know what we had searched for if we needed it. Our computer colleagues tell us that, despite its simplicity, there are no configuration options that allow us to put a breadcrumb to know what search we have done. We request this improvement for new versions. Thank you -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 17

[Bug 33544] New: Squash some ILL fields to alleviate request table overflow
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 May '26

24 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33544 Bug ID: 33544 Summary: Squash some ILL fields to alleviate request table overflow Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com The ILL requests' table listing all ILL requests is prone to overflowing it's container and requiring horizontal scrolling. This is against a number of accessibility guidelines, and just doesn't look very nice. I believe we could merge a number of the current columns to display the same data vertically in one column. I think the item details (author, title, article title, issue, volume, year, pages) could all be merged into a column that looks more like how we display search catalogue search results. That would save us a lot of horizontal space to start with. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 69

[Bug 31717] New: Value builder unimarc_field_010.pl should also use 214$c
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 May '26

24 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31717 Bug ID: 31717 Summary: Value builder unimarc_field_010.pl should also use 214$c Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Value builder unimarc_field_010.pl tries to find publisher from ISBN in order to fill 210$c. Since there is now 214$c for publisher this value builder should be adapted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 42

[Bug 15792] New: Double-clicking the 'renew' button on circulation.pl will double-charge account management fee
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 May '26

24 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15792 Bug ID: 15792 Summary: Double-clicking the 'renew' button on circulation.pl will double-charge account management fee Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.18 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: barton(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com PREREQUISITES 1) Create an account type that has an enrollment fee, and create a borrower of that type. 2) Write off any account management fees charged to that borrower by the account creation. STEPS TO RE-CREATE 1) Change borrower's dateexpiry to make the borrower expired. 2) Paste borrower's card number into 'Check out' bar 3) A warning will appear saying that the borrower's account has expired, including a 'Renew' link. 4) Double-click the link 5) Check the borrower's fines. You will see two account management fees in a row. distinct from the fee that was written off just after the patron was created. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 20

[Bug 33296] New: Linker should search for authority records with an appropriate 008/14, 15, 16 value
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 May '26

23 May '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33296 Bug ID: 33296 Summary: Linker should search for authority records with an appropriate 008/14,15,16 value Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: phil(a)chetcolibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 33277 In an authority record, 008/14 = 'a' says it's appropriate for use as a main or added entry (1xx, 7xx), 008/15 = 'a' says it's appropriate for use as a subject entry, and 008/16 = 'a' says it's appropriate for use as a series entry (800-830, 440 since we still support it). In a world where we support multiple subject thesauri, we need a way to tell the difference between a name entry which intends to be used as a main entry and one which intends to only be used as a subject authority, and the way the subject-only one should say that is by having 008/14 = 'b' Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33277 [Bug 33277] Correctly handle linking subfields with no defined thesaurus -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 36