- Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 38492] New: Some javascript translatable strings do not get picked up for translation
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38492 Bug ID: 38492 Summary: Some javascript translatable strings do not get picked up for translation Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: I18N/L10N Assignee: pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com Reporter: pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: f.demians(a)tamil.fr, jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 12

[Bug 34597] New: Expired patrons can still place ILL requests through OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34597 Bug ID: 34597 Summary: Expired patrons can still place ILL requests through OPAC Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com CC: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de, magnus(a)libriotech.no, martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com, nick(a)bywatersolutions.com, pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com, tomascohen(a)gmail.com Noticed this, not sure if very severe or not. But I wonder if placing an ILL request should be included in BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions. To reproduce, on k-t-d: 1) Enable ILLmodule and install FreeForm, run: bash <(curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ammopt/koha-ill-dev/master/start-ill-dev.…) 2) Make koha/koha user expired, run mysql-kohadev: update borrowers set dateexpiry = '2020-12-31' where borrowernumber=51; 3) Visit OPAC/cgi-bin/koha/opac-user.pl and verify there's a user expired notification 4) Visit OPAC/cgi-bin/koha/opac-illrequests.pl and create a new ILL request 5) It's created with no issue -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 52

[Bug 37426] New: DBIC schema file Category.pm manually modified causing checksum mismatch and blocking refresh of that file
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37426 Bug ID: 37426 Summary: DBIC schema file Category.pm manually modified causing checksum mismatch and blocking refresh of that file Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Database Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: victor(a)tuxayo.net QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org dbic complains at the end of the refresh: DBIx::Class::Schema::Loader::make_schema_at(): Checksum mismatch in './/Koha/Schema/Result/Category.pm', the auto-generated part of the file has been modified outside of this loader. Aborting. If you want to overwrite these modifications, set the 'overwrite_modifications' loader option. It seems to come from commit "Bug 28924: Add DBIC file" Which has changes in the autogenerated section but not in the footer of that section having the checksum. Hence causing the mismatch when running `dbic` It might have been a conflict where the resolution accidentally dropped the checksum changes. Because the rest of the changes look indeed autogenerated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 15461] Add staff equivalent for OpacLocationOnDetail
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15461 --- Comment #40 from Lucas Gass (lukeg) <lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #39) > Hum maybe I am mixing up OpacLocationOnDetail and > OpacLocationBranchToDisplay again... I will redo this bug without a system preference, it seems unneeded since we can make shelving location its own column. We can also file a Bug to remove OpacLocationOnDetail, in my opinion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 19876] New: Koha::Account->pay() does not exit specific fine loop when balance is used up
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19876 Bug ID: 19876 Summary: Koha::Account->pay() does not exit specific fine loop when balance is used up Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org If a patron selects specific fines to pay and enters an amount less than all of those fines the loop will continue through all fines. This can be problematic for lost fines which are not paid or not paid fully as they will be marked 'Paid for...' and returned -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 14825] Accounts Rewrite Omnibus
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14825 Bug 14825 depends on bug 19876, which changed state. Bug 19876 Summary: Koha::Account->pay() does not exit specific fine loop when balance is used up https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19876 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 17138] New: UpdateFine() modyfies existing fine records even when there is no need
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17138 Bug ID: 17138 Summary: UpdateFine() modyfies existing fine records even when there is no need Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: abl(a)biblos.pk.edu.pl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com In C4/Overdues.pm: 574: # we're updating an existing fine. Only modify if amount changed 577: if ( $data->{'amount'} != $amount ) { for some numbers (e.g. 5.60) the comparison in line 577 fails ($data->{'amount'} is decimal(28,6) i.e. a string, and $amount may be a floating point number with no exact binary representation). E.g. when the fine amounts are multiple of 0.20, it fails for the 33.3% of the amounts (on average). Depending on the fine charging settings, this may trigger unnecessary database writes (and a lot of them). If 'Fine Charging Interval' is 1 day, this has very little practical consequences (misc/cronjobs/fines.pl script is usually run once per day, and all fines need an increase anyway). But if the charging interval is longer, e.g. 7 days, in a given day amount changes only for the 1/7 of the fines (again, on average), and over 60% of the database writes would be redundant. To reproduce: 1) run misc/cronjobs/fines.pl 2) add warn "AMOUNT ".$data->{'amount'}." vs $amount"; below line 577 in C4/Overdues.pm 3) run misc/cronjobs/fines.pl again 4) you'll see some warnings like 'AMOUNT 5.600000 vs 5.6' or: dump accountlines table after step 1), run the script 2nd time, dump the table again and compare the contents - some of the records would have a different timestamp. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 38

[Bug 14825] Accounts Rewrite Omnibus
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14825 Bug 14825 depends on bug 17138, which changed state. Bug 17138 Summary: UpdateFine() modyfies existing fine records even when there is no need https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17138 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|In Discussion |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 8088] Png-images of covers lost transparency
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8088 Eric Bégin <eric.begin(a)inLibro.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric.begin(a)inLibro.com --- Comment #6 from Eric Bégin <eric.begin(a)inLibro.com> --- After few years, this still an issue. ;-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 26662] New: Authority linking doesn't work with custom authority type
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26662 Bug ID: 26662 Summary: Authority linking doesn't work with custom authority type Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org If you're using custom authority types, automatic linking via C4::Biblio::LinkBibHeadingsToAuthorities will never work. It's because C4::Heading::MARC21 has a hard-coded mapping of bib fields to authority types (instead of consulting the MARC bibliographic framework). This means if you're using "CORPO_NAME_AWSEOME" instead of "CORPO_NAME" for your authorities, you'll never get an automated match, since C4::Heading::_search (used ultimately by C4::Linker::Default) uses the hard-coded auth_type from C4::Heading::MARC21. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 5