December 2017 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 18908] New: Warning "Compatibility levels before 9 are deprecated"
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Jan '24

05 Jan '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18908 Bug ID: 18908 Summary: Warning "Compatibility levels before 9 are deprecated" Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Packaging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: mtompset(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: mirko(a)abunchofthings.net The following output: dh: Compatibility levels before 9 are deprecated (level 7 in use) dh_testdir -O--fail-missing dh_auto_clean -O--fail-missing dh_auto_clean: Compatibility levels before 9 are deprecated (level 7 in use) dh_clean -O--fail-missing is given when trying to following these instructions: https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Building_Debian_Packages_-_The_Easy_Way -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 11

[Bug 19616] New: Formatted Contents Note (Marc 21 505), subfield g isn' t visible in the OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Jan '24

02 Jan '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19616 Bug ID: 19616 Summary: Formatted Contents Note (Marc 21 505), subfield g isn't visible in the OPAC Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 16.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: verolencinas(a)yahoo.com.ar QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The 505 field in Marc 21, Formatted Contents Note, includes subfield g "Miscellaneous information". According to the Marc 21 format for bibliographic data, it is used to record "volume, part, page numbering or other extent information such as dates". If you use it in Koha, this information isn't visible in the OPAC. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 35

[Bug 19795] New: Allow files to be uploaded and stored in object storage ( Swift and S3)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Dec '23

13 Dec '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19795 Bug ID: 19795 Summary: Allow files to be uploaded and stored in object storage (Swift and S3) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: chris(a)bigballofwax.co.nz QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Currently if we enable uploading and attaching files to a biblio, we only have the option to store the locally on the file system. More and more Koha are being hosted in the "cloud" we should allow people to use the object storage offerings to store their uploaded files. This bug will add support for Openstack Swift, and Amazon S3 only, and only for files attached to biblios. However the code should be able to be used for book covers etc in the future if someone wants to add that feature -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 18974] New: Adding further selenium tests
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Dec '23

11 Dec '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18974 Bug ID: 18974 Summary: Adding further selenium tests Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: alexbuckley(a)catalyst.net.nz Reporter: alexbuckley(a)catalyst.net.nz QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The patches attached to this bug report will be building on the work completed in bug 13691, and 18804 by adding more selenium tests to the t/db_dependent/selenium directory. These selenium tests will test the following: * Authenticating a patron (not default user) into both OPAC and intranet * Searching for item in OPAC and intranet * Go through web installer and onboarding tool * Submitting a purchase suggestion in OPAC * Creating a currency, budget and fund -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 51

[Bug 17735] New: Merge boraccount and pay pages into one
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Dec '23

10 Dec '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17735 Bug ID: 17735 Summary: Merge boraccount and pay pages into one Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: josef.moravec(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com We don't really need to have this agenda on two pages - using the one pages would be simpler and makes the workflow more straightforward -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 25

[Bug 16959] New: E-mail alerts for saved searches
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Dec '23

05 Dec '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16959 Bug ID: 16959 Summary: E-mail alerts for saved searches Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org It would be nice if Koha allowed to send e-mails to patrons when a new record is created for a saved search. Examples: - New records are added within a specific call number range - New records where the title contains certain words It should be possible to set this up individually per patron. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 17499] New: Koha objects for messaging preferences
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Nov '23

30 Nov '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17499 Bug ID: 17499 Summary: Koha objects for messaging preferences Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lari.taskula(a)jns.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Create Koha objects for messaging preferences. We need to create REST API endpoint for managing patron messaging preferences and this is the first step. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 241

[Bug 15977] New: Optional double screen message in Patron Info/Status
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Nov '23

20 Nov '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15977 Bug ID: 15977 Summary: Optional double screen message in Patron Info/Status Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: SIP2 Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: colin.campbell(a)ptfs-europe.com This code in MsgType.pm: $resp .= maybe_add( FID_SCREEN_MSG, $patron->{branchcode}, $server ) if ( $server->{account}->{send_patron_home_library_in_af} ); produces two AFs if you enable that attribute in your config. Not sure if that should be the case and is conform protocol. Also: are we solving a problem here in the wrong place? It looks kind of inappropriate use.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 19098] New: Additional logic for 260/RDA 264 fields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Nov '23

17 Nov '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19098 Bug ID: 19098 Summary: Additional logic for 260/RDA 264 fields Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl If we have implemented 10306 and 19096, we can add some additional logic for multiple RDA 264 fields. Making e.g. the place and year picked more accurate than just glueing together or picking the first one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 18827] New: Elasticsearch mappings - not displayed or retrieved in saved order
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Nov '23

07 Nov '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18827 Bug ID: 18827 Summary: Elasticsearch mappings - not displayed or retrieved in saved order Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The mappings listed under 'Biblios' and 'Authorities' are draggable - this allows ordering of fields. The ordering affects the id field in the search_marc_map table When retrieving for display or mapping we are not ordering by the this field. In general I am not sure if we are gaining anything with this ordering: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/guide/current/_sorting.html " When sorting on fields with more than one value, remember that the values do not have any intrinsic order; a multivalue field is just a bag of values. Which one do you choose to sort on?" I think we can switch to the idea that a single field per index should be chosen for ordering: author = 100 (only make this one sortable) author = 700 author = 245c or, in the case of authorities, we should expect a single field to populate the field for sorting (100, 110, 150 ... are alldefined as 'main-heading' - but each record should only have a single one of these field) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 18