October 2018 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 17499] New: Koha objects for messaging preferences
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Nov '23

30 Nov '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17499 Bug ID: 17499 Summary: Koha objects for messaging preferences Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lari.taskula(a)jns.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Create Koha objects for messaging preferences. We need to create REST API endpoint for managing patron messaging preferences and this is the first step. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 241

[Bug 21384] New: ILL requests table - allow patron sorting by last name
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Nov '23

29 Nov '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21384 Bug ID: 21384 Summary: ILL requests table - allow patron sorting by last name Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew.isherwood(a)ptfs-europe.com Currently only sorting by first name is possible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 21236] New: Restore ability to selectively set item to lost without generating fee
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Nov '23

29 Nov '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21236 Bug ID: 21236 Summary: Restore ability to selectively set item to lost without generating fee Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 17.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Prior to bug 19974 a user could set an item to lost via additem.pl and the item would not be marked as returned and the patron would not be charged the replacement cost. The previous bug sought to standardize behavior between additem.pl and moredetail.pl, making both pages mark lost items and returned and charge the patron. Based on feedback about existing library workflows that relied upon the discrepancy between to two behaviors, the MarkLostItemsasReturned syspref was added to give libraries a choice of when and if an item would be marked as returned when set to lost. However, no such syspref was added to give the option to maintain the inconsistent legacy behavior in charging replacement costs when items are lost. This breaks existing workflows for libraries using lost status to handle Claims Returned items where the intent is to mark an item as lost but not charge the patron. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 20595] New: EDI: Add support for LRP (Library Rotation Plan) for Koha with Stock Rotation enabled
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Nov '23

24 Nov '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20595 Bug ID: 20595 Summary: EDI: Add support for LRP (Library Rotation Plan) for Koha with Stock Rotation enabled Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: new feature Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: alex.sassmannshausen(a)gmail.com, andrew.isherwood(a)ptfs-europe.com, fiona.borthwick(a)ptfs-europe.com, gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org, jonathan.field(a)ptfs-europe.com, josef.moravec(a)gmail.com, katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com, kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com, lisetteslatah(a)gmail.com, liz(a)catalyst.net.nz, sally.healey(a)cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk, tomascohen(a)gmail.com Depends on: 11897, 14187, 18137 This submission will add the support for the Edifact LRP field in Koha, using the field to automatically add ordered items to stock rotation plans. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11897 [Bug 11897] Stock Rotation for Koha https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14187 [Bug 14187] branchtransfer needs a primary key (id) for DBIx and common sense. https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18137 [Bug 18137] Migrate from Mojolicious::Plugin::Swagger2 to Mojolicious::Plugin::OpenAPI -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 25

[Bug 20670] New: Add markup and standard classes for sidebars and main content areas
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Nov '23

21 Nov '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20670 Bug ID: 20670 Summary: Add markup and standard classes for sidebars and main content areas Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Blocks: 14546 As we move away from YUI grids, it would be helpful if we could consistently add some classes to the primary sections of the page. That would allow us to style elements differently based on their container's class. I've already begun adding a "main" class to the <div> which is the primary "container" for the Bootstrap grid. It typically looks like this: <div class="main container-fluid"> <div class="row"> <div class="col-sm-5 col-md-4"> I would like to add an additional container that wraps the primary content region for the page. This container should have no style attached to it (as it might interfere with grid layout), but can serve as a context for styles within it. ----------------------------------------------- * .main * * ------------------------------------------- * * * * .main-content * * * * * * * * * .sidebar * -------------------------- * * * * * * * * * * * * * .row * * * * * * * .col-* * * * * * * * ...etc. * * * * * * -------------------------- * * * * * * * * ------------------------------------------- * * * ----------------------------------------------- The use I have right away is to style forms differently based on whether they are in the sidebar or the main-content area. Right now we have some CSS which depends on YUI grid classes, and we need to replace that which isn't dependent on the grid system we choose. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14546 [Bug 14546] Make staff client templates responsive -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 15977] New: Optional double screen message in Patron Info/Status
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Nov '23

20 Nov '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15977 Bug ID: 15977 Summary: Optional double screen message in Patron Info/Status Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: SIP2 Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: colin.campbell(a)ptfs-europe.com This code in MsgType.pm: $resp .= maybe_add( FID_SCREEN_MSG, $patron->{branchcode}, $server ) if ( $server->{account}->{send_patron_home_library_in_af} ); produces two AFs if you enable that attribute in your config. Not sure if that should be the case and is conform protocol. Also: are we solving a problem here in the wrong place? It looks kind of inappropriate use.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 19098] New: Additional logic for 260/RDA 264 fields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Nov '23

17 Nov '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19098 Bug ID: 19098 Summary: Additional logic for 260/RDA 264 fields Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl If we have implemented 10306 and 19096, we can add some additional logic for multiple RDA 264 fields. Making e.g. the place and year picked more accurate than just glueing together or picking the first one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 21106] New: oai.pl XML output doesn't validate against OAI-PMH XML schema
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Nov '23

16 Nov '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21106 Bug ID: 21106 Summary: oai.pl XML output doesn't validate against OAI-PMH XML schema Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: Web services Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pablo.bianchi(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Blocks: 21102 When using some verbs Koha return a well formed but in invalid XML. CLI test: wget -q "https://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd" wget -q "https://demo.bibkat.no/cgi-bin/koha/oai.pl?verb=ListSets" -O test.xml xmllint --noout --schema OAI-PMH.xsd test.xml Web test: An online way to test this is with http://validator.oaipmh.com/ 1. verb=ListSets: When no set is defined Koha incorrectly output <ListSets/>. A set (child element of ListSets) should always be there, minOccurs default value is 1. Otherwhise should be: <error code="noSetHierarchy">No sets defined</error>, AFAIK even if tehere is no error. 2. verb=Identify: setDescription is not a string, is descriptionType ##other, "defined by a community" (?) See https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17785#c13 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21102 [Bug 21102] OAI-PMH specification conformance [UMBRELLA] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 21330] New: Add xslt for authority normal view in OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Nov '23

10 Nov '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21330 Bug ID: 21330 Summary: Add xslt for authority normal view in OPAC Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: new feature Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: marjorie.barry-vila(a)collecto.ca QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Hi, It would be fine to have a xslt stylesheet for authority normal view in OPAC (opac-authoritiesdetail.pl). Regards, Marjorie -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 74

[Bug 18827] New: Elasticsearch mappings - not displayed or retrieved in saved order
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Nov '23

07 Nov '23

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18827 Bug ID: 18827 Summary: Elasticsearch mappings - not displayed or retrieved in saved order Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The mappings listed under 'Biblios' and 'Authorities' are draggable - this allows ordering of fields. The ordering affects the id field in the search_marc_map table When retrieving for display or mapping we are not ordering by the this field. In general I am not sure if we are gaining anything with this ordering: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/guide/current/_sorting.html " When sorting on fields with more than one value, remember that the values do not have any intrinsic order; a multivalue field is just a bag of values. Which one do you choose to sort on?" I think we can switch to the idea that a single field per index should be chosen for ordering: author = 100 (only make this one sortable) author = 700 author = 245c or, in the case of authorities, we should expect a single field to populate the field for sorting (100, 110, 150 ... are alldefined as 'main-heading' - but each record should only have a single one of these field) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 18