August 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 40092] New: Adding authorities - clicking save doesn't fill auto-populated fields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 31 Aug '26

31 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40092 Bug ID: 40092 Summary: Adding authorities - clicking save doesn't fill auto-populated fields Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: david(a)davidnind.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When adding a new authority record, clicking save (without filling in any fields) doesn't fill in the auto-populated fields such as 000, 003, and 008. In a 24.11.x instance, this works (start up a local instance or use one of the demos): 1. Authorities > New authority > Topical term 2. Don't enter any information in any fields. 3. Click 'save'. 4. Note that fields such as 000 and 003 are auto-populated (not sure if that is the right term). In 25.05.00 or main, this no longer works: 1. Repeat steps 1 to 3. 2. Note that: - fields such as 000 and 003 are not auto-populated - the mandatory fields are now highlighted in yellow - clicking the individual fields doesn't auto-populate them -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 26

[Bug 35870] New: Adding an edit_authorities subpermission for editauthorities
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 31 Aug '26

31 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35870 Bug ID: 35870 Summary: Adding an edit_authorities subpermission for editauthorities Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff interface Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: wainuiwitikapark(a)catalyst.net.nz QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 50

[Bug 35914] New: Add permission for changing a user password
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 31 Aug '26

31 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35914 Bug ID: 35914 Summary: Add permission for changing a user password Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 23.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: bwsdonna(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com There are situations where libraries do not want staff to be able to change a patron's password using the Change Password button but there is currently no way to split out permission to block this. You have to turn off the ability to view/edit all patron info which is also not helpful. Some libraries prefer that staff either send a password reset email, or direct patrons to the OPAC to reset a password. It would be a great enhancement to add a subpermission to BORROWERS to allow/disallow the ability for staff to change a patron password. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 32122] New: Wrong permissions check on item circulation alerts
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 31 Aug '26

31 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32122 Bug ID: 32122 Summary: Wrong permissions check on item circulation alerts Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff Client Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Bug 14391 added granular permissions for the administration module, however, there was a mismatch in the check on item circulation alerts and the new permission -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 34643] New: Split CircConfirmItemParts for self-checkout and self-checkin
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 31 Aug '26

31 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34643 Bug ID: 34643 Summary: Split CircConfirmItemParts for self-checkout and self-checkin Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Self checkout Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Many libraries wish to be able to allow self-check for multi-part items while requesting librarians to verify the parts when checking out/in at the desk. It makes sense to split CircConfirmItemParts into three prefs such that the feature can be enabled/disabled for SCO and SCI independently. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 31

[Bug 38336] New: Confusion between 099 and 942 field in UNIMARC framework
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Aug '26

30 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38336 Bug ID: 38336 Summary: Confusion between 099 and 942 field in UNIMARC framework Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: mathsabypro(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl I believe there is something wrong in UNIMARC default framework (https://github.com/Koha-Community/Koha/blob/main/installer/data/mysql/en/ma… ) We have 2 fields for "local" data (specific to Koha) at biblio level : 099 and 942 And the same pieces of information are present in subfields of both fields : - 099$x and 942$0 (Number of issues => biblioitems.totalissues) - 099$s and 942$s (Serial record => biblio.serial) - 099$t and 942$c (Koha item type => biblioitems.itemtype) I suppose it is an error, because it makes no sense... And note that the 099 field in UNIMARC framework is called "local dates", so it should not contain information about item type or number of issue. Do you think we could remove safely from the default templates 099$x, 099$s, 099$t ? I don't know if those values may be harcoded somewhere in the code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 76

[Bug 21173] New: Run auto item modifications by age every hour and set the item age unit to hours
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Aug '26

30 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21173 Bug ID: 21173 Summary: Run auto item modifications by age every hour and set the item age unit to hours Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: alexbuckley(a)catalyst.net.nz QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Make auto item modification by age cronjob run more often than once daily. Setting this cronjob to run every hour will be set in the /etc/cron.hourly/koha-common. However 2 further changes to the automatic item modification tool to make an hourly running cronjob useful. 1. Be able to set the age of the item in hours not just days. This is so an hourly cronjob has items to alter because items will exceed the age limit more frequently than if the item age is in hours. 2. Give the user the choice of what the age starting point (time from which the age of the item is calculated) used in the cronjob is. The two possible age starting points that users have to choose between are: * Item creation (this is the age starting point in master currently) * Item last altered This is so items whic have been in the catalogue for a while can still be affected by the automatic item modification by age cronjob. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 86

[Bug 34631] New: Independentbranches : Non-superuser should not be able to write Additional contents for other branches
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Aug '26

28 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34631 Bug ID: 34631 Summary: Independentbranches : Non-superuser should not be able to write Additional contents for other branches Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: hammat.wele(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When syspref Independentbranches is enabled Non-superuser should not be able to write Additional contents for other branches To reproduce: 1- Connect to staff interface as superlibrarian 2- Enable IndependentBranches preference 3- Go to Tools -> HTML customizations 4- Crete an additional content for all libraries 5- Create or edit a borrower 5-1- Set permission for the borrower - catalogue - edit_additional_contents 4- Log in to the staff interface with the non-superlibrarian staff user 5- Go to Tools -> HTML customizations --> you can delete or edit the additional contents created by superlibrarian for All libraries 6- Click on New entry --> you can add additional content for other branches -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 106

[Bug 28593] New: Add ability to charge lost fee when applying new lost status when resolving a claim
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Aug '26

28 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28593 Bug ID: 28593 Summary: Add ability to charge lost fee when applying new lost status when resolving a claim Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Depends on: 28271 Bug 28271 added the ability to apply a new lost status when resolving a claim. We should also add the ability to charge a replacement fee. Many libraries do not charge a replacement fee when a claim is generated. If the item is not found within the time period allowed by library policy, then the item is assumed lost, the claim is resolved, and the item is set to lost. At that point, the library would like to charge the patron. As things stand, there is not a way to generate a lost fee tied to that issue_id. You'd have to either create a manual invoice or return the item, check it back out to the patron, and mark it lost again. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28271 [Bug 28271] Add the ability to set a new lost status when a claim is resolved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 10

[Bug 22439] New: Duplicated code in PrepHostMarcField and prepare_host_field
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Aug '26

28 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22439 Bug ID: 22439 Summary: Duplicated code in PrepHostMarcField and prepare_host_field Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pasi.kallinen(a)koha-suomi.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Target Milestone: --- The C4/Biblio.pm subroutines PrepHostMarcField and prepare_host_field both do the same thing, so should be merged. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 63