September 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 26540] New: Issue Credit with Cash Registers
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Oct '26

30 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26540 Bug ID: 26540 Summary: Issue Credit with Cash Registers Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 20.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kelly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org If a library system has enabled Cash Registers but one branch does not use this. When using the Issue Credit - CASH option from the Accounting Module, an Internal Server Error will occur. 1. Turn on Cash Registers 2. Set up a Cash Register for branch A 3. Log into Branch B and try to issue credit with CASH - this will not work and give an ISE. Other options, such as Check, Credit card, etc will work but not the option for Cash. Understandably, it is because there is not a place for the cash to come from if no cash register is enabled. But I can see this an issue for multi-branch systems where some want to use the Cash register option,but others do not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 46

[Bug 39909] New: Batch modification with regex does not work with control fields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Oct '26

30 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39909 Bug ID: 39909 Summary: Batch modification with regex does not work with control fields Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl In MARC modification templates if you define a copy of a control field into another control field. The regexp part does not work. Because of : https://git.koha-community.org/Koha-community/Koha/src/commit/83f8ba4eeed5c… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 28

[Bug 34142] New: Add column sub_location to items table
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Oct '26

30 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34142 Bug ID: 34142 Summary: Add column sub_location to items table Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Database Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: emmi.takkinen(a)koha-suomi.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We should add new column sub_location to items and deleteditems table. This can be used to indicate e.g. if item has some other more specific location than permanent location. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 57

[Bug 38010] New: Migrate vendors to Vue
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Oct '26

30 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38010 Bug ID: 38010 Summary: Migrate vendors to Vue Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: matt.blenkinsop(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 488

[Bug 27512] New: Block creation of invalid authorised values for LOST, NOTFORLOAN, DAMAGED, RESTRICTED, and WITHDRAWN
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Oct '26

30 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27512 Bug ID: 27512 Summary: Block creation of invalid authorised values for LOST, NOTFORLOAN, DAMAGED, RESTRICTED, and WITHDRAWN Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Several authorised value categories have inherent limits on what values can be used. Bug 24288 adds text to the screen to tell you about these limits, but doesn't enforce them. It'd be good to just stop a user from saving a value that won't work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 16

[Bug 35612] New: Branchcode information for all customer fees lines
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Oct '26

30 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35612 Bug ID: 35612 Summary: Branchcode information for all customer fees lines Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pirkko-liisa.lauhikari(a)ouka.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We would like to have branchcode recorded to the OVERDUE fees in accountlines table. Configurability is desired, so that it is possible to choose which library is recorded. Options could be customer's home library, issuing library and item's home library. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 82

[Bug 39419] New: Holds API treats 'expiration_date' as 'patron_expiration_date'
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39419 Bug ID: 39419 Summary: Holds API treats 'expiration_date' as 'patron_expiration_date' Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com This is going to have a related issue in Aspen, but I think the confusion starts here Koha has two fields for hold expiration: expirationdate - (usually) auto generated date set based no when holds on the shelf expire patron_exiration_date - the day the patron says they don't need the hold after The API takes "expiration_date" and maps it to "patron_expiration_date" This can be unclear for outside systems. Aspen has a 'Default Not Needed After Days' setting which is assumed to be setting the automatic expiraton date, but in fact sets the patron date We should allow either field to be set via the API -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 110

[Bug 39160] New: Mojolicious::Plugin::OAuth2 is loaded suboptimally
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39160 Bug ID: 39160 Summary: Mojolicious::Plugin::OAuth2 is loaded suboptimally Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org This is a deep cut, but the following line is not optimal: $self->plugin( 'Mojolicious::Plugin::OAuth2' => $oauth_configuration ); Mojolicious will first try to load that as Mojolicious::Plugin::Mojolicious::Plugin::OAuth2 before it realises that we've already loaded Mojolicious::Plugin::OAuth2 earlier in Koha::REST::V1. I reckon that should say: $self->plugin( 'OAuth2' => $oauth_configuration ); -- In the grand scheme of things, it's not a big deal, but we can save ourselves 26 system calls by changing 1 line. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 26

[Bug 32542] New: Coce images not appearing in staff client
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32542 Bug ID: 32542 Summary: Coce images not appearing in staff client Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl To recreate: 1. Have Coce on, use 'https://coce.bywatersolututions.com' as the CoceProviders if needed. Select all providers 2. Turn on IntranetCoce and OpacCoce. 3. Do a OPAC search to retrieve some Coce images on both the OPAC results page and detail. 4. Do the same search and look at the same detail pages in the staff client. Nothing appears. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 45

[Bug 38181] New: Extreme slow search results on OPAC (only) search when result records contain multiple items.
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38181 Bug ID: 38181 Summary: Extreme slow search results on OPAC (only) search when result records contain multiple items. Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 24.05 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kdask(a)altsol.gr QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When performing a search on the OPAC, if the results containing records that are having a large number of holdings (e.g serials with over 1000 issues/items or even less) there is a huge delay on showing the results (~x8 times slower for the same search if we remove the multiple items from the resulting records) The odd is that the exact same search on the intranet interface works without these delays so I'm guessing that this is a problem on the OPAC search implementation? The problem exists with zebra but also with the use of Elasticsearch engine. Using elasticsearch tried also removing all the item related indexes - 952* subfields (and re-indexing) but the result is the same. In the following google drive link you can find a demo bib record with 1809 items (MarcXML - Marc21) if it helps to reproduce it.https://drive.google.com/file/d/11SQmfdWal9tzcovS0mrgu6vIOPf1aCbc/view You will have to import the record, and then try searching for the title on OPAC: The Journal of biological chemistry. In my case with a decent server without load (Debian, 4cpu cores, 16gb RAM) with plack enabled takes about ~50sec to get the result. Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 50