January 2018 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 19573] New: Link to make a new list in masthead in OPAC only appears / works if no other list already exists
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Jan '18

19 Jan '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19573 Bug ID: 19573 Summary: Link to make a new list in masthead in OPAC only appears / works if no other list already exists Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 17.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: kelly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The new enhancement from bug 17948 allows for a quick New List option in the List function found in the masthead in OPAC. This enhancement can only be seen when the patron has no lists already created. If a patron has a private list created, the option for that New List will not appear. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 11976] Add column settings + new column "Publication date" to the subscription table
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Jan '18

19 Jan '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11976 Fridolin SOMERS <fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|Pushed to Stable |RESOLVED CC| |fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.co | |m --- Comment #26 from Fridolin SOMERS <fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com> --- Enhancement not pushed to 17.05.x -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 19725] New: OAI-PMH ListRecords and ListIdentifiers should use biblio_metadata.timestamp
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Jan '18

19 Jan '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19725 Bug ID: 19725 Summary: OAI-PMH ListRecords and ListIdentifiers should use biblio_metadata.timestamp Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Web services Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 19724 Since bug 17196, biblioitems.timestamp is not always updated after a change in the MARC record. Filtering should be based on biblio_metadata.timestamp instead. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19724 [Bug 19724] Add timestamp to biblio_metadata and deletedbiblio_metadata -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 17

[Bug 19724] New: Add timestamp to biblio_metadata and deletedbiblio_metadata
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Jan '18

19 Jan '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19724 Bug ID: 19724 Summary: Add timestamp to biblio_metadata and deletedbiblio_metadata Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Database Assignee: julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com Reporter: julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Since bug 17196, biblioitems.timestamp is not always updated after a change in the MARC record. We need to know the last modification time of the MARC record for some features (like OAI-PMH parameters 'from' and 'until' for instance) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 17

[Bug 7317] Add an Interlibrary Loan Module to Circulation and OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Jan '18

19 Jan '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7317 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |20041 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20041 [Bug 20041] ILL module missing from more menu in staff when activated -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 9634] Allow for parameters re-use on SQL reports
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Jan '18

19 Jan '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9634 M. Tompsett <mtompset(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Signoff |Signed Off -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 9634] Allow for parameters re-use on SQL reports
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Jan '18

19 Jan '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9634 M. Tompsett <mtompset(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #70685|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #6 from M. Tompsett <mtompset(a)hotmail.com> --- Created attachment 70736 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=70736&action=ed… Bug 9634 [QA Followup] - Add new column to kohastructure.sql Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset(a)hotmail.com> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 9634] Allow for parameters re-use on SQL reports
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Jan '18

19 Jan '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9634 M. Tompsett <mtompset(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #70592|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #5 from M. Tompsett <mtompset(a)hotmail.com> --- Created attachment 70735 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=70735&action=ed… Bug 9634: Allow for combining same paraneters in SQL reports This patch set adds a new colum to saved_sql 'combine_params' If set, parameters that have the same name and data type will only be asked for once from the user To test: 1 - Create a report that takes multiple parameters, e.g.: SELECT <<cat>> AS one, <<dog|branches>> AS two, <<dog|YES_NO>> as three, <<cat>> as four, <<dog|branches>> as five 2 - Run this report, note you are asked for five parameters 3 - Apply patch 4 - Update database 5 - Run report, note you are still asked for five parameters 6 - Edit report, note the 'Combine params' options, say YES!!!!! 7 - Re-run the report, you shoudl be asked for three parameters 8 - Verify the results reflect the supplied parameters 9 - Create a new report (perhaps something more substantive) 10 - Save with 'combine params' checke 11 - View in saved reports and see the new 'combine params' column 12 - Verify it is correctly set 13 - Run the report and verify correct results 14 - prove -v t/db_dependent/Reports/Guided.t Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset(a)hotmail.com> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 13995] Proper Exception handling
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Jan '18

19 Jan '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13995 --- Comment #26 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen(a)gmail.com> --- This patch doesn't really require unit tests in my opinion. But we didn't agree (explicitly) on the one exception per file approach, and since this patch was posted several exceptions have been added. This patch is of big value because Olli put a lot of time thinking about the exceptions we might need and also how to organize them. This should be used as a basis for new exceptions addition. Maybe organized by type or module as the ones we already have (which should be rearranged too, virtualshelves, etc) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 13995] Proper Exception handling
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Jan '18

19 Jan '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13995 --- Comment #25 from M. Tompsett <mtompset(a)hotmail.com> --- (In reply to Josef Moravec from comment #24) > (In reply to Olli-Antti Kivilahti from comment #23) > > Created attachment 60963 [details] [review] [review] > > Bug 13995 - Proper Exception handling > > Is it ready for testing again? What is the test plan? Nope. Because the test that Olli-Antti Kivilahti added was only for one of the exceptions added. Still Failed QA, because of inadequate test coverage. Jonathan Druart came across as rather particular on this point in a recent IRC meeting. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0