- Koha-devel - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 141] "System parameters" page calls itself "Koha admin page"
by bugzilla-daemon＠wilbur.katipo.co.nz 04 Dec '02

04 Dec '02

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=141 a.c.li(a)ieee.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Page footer refers to admin |"System parameters" page |page as "system parameters" |calls itself "Koha admin | |page" ------- Additional Comments From a.c.li(a)ieee.org 2002-12-05 16:09 ------- Should we change the heading to "System parameters"? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 144] New: Missing mandatory subfields not correctly highlighted
by bugzilla-daemon＠wilbur.katipo.co.nz 04 Dec '02

04 Dec '02

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=144 Summary: Missing mandatory subfields not correctly highlighted Product: Koha Version: CVS Platform: PC Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Acquisitions (Simple) AssignedTo: tonnesen(a)cmsd.bc.ca ReportedBy: a.c.li(a)ieee.org QAContact: koha-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net Suppose I enter a biblio record and is missing 3 mandatory subfields. I enter one and press Items>>. Koha now tells me that I am missing 2 mandatory subfields, but the one that I filled in is still highlighted in red. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 143] New: Deletion of subfield gives wrong feedback
by bugzilla-daemon＠wilbur.katipo.co.nz 04 Dec '02

04 Dec '02

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=143 Summary: Deletion of subfield gives wrong feedback Product: Koha Version: CVS Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Parameters AssignedTo: tonnesen(a)cmsd.bc.ca ReportedBy: a.c.li(a)ieee.org QAContact: koha-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net If I try to delete a subfield, Koha asks whether I am confirming to delete *another* subfield, even though it will really delete the subfield I ask it to delete (instead of the one it asks me to confirm). Scenario: I use Add New to add a "093" field (uses in my library to mean "local call number", LC-style). Added subfield a "LC Call Number" linked to biblioitems.dewey. Added subfield c "Cutter Number" linked to biblioitems.subclass. I then suspected that c might be defined incorrectly so I press the Delete on the right of subfield c. Koha asks me Subfield LC Class Number CONFIRM DELETION If I press Yes, subfield c (Cutter Number) is deleted as I intended, even though Koha asks me to confirm deletion of LC Class Number (subfield a). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 134] Cannot add MARC subfield
by bugzilla-daemon＠wilbur.katipo.co.nz 04 Dec '02

04 Dec '02

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134 ------- Additional Comments From a.c.li(a)ieee.org 2002-12-05 06:08 ------- Yes, the patch to updatedatabase is already uploaded. Please commit to CVS after double-checking. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 134] Cannot add MARC subfield
by bugzilla-daemon＠wilbur.katipo.co.nz 04 Dec '02

04 Dec '02

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134 ------- Additional Comments From d.strainchamps(a)wanadoo.fr 2002-12-05 05:57 ------- I think that's updatedatabase that we have to change ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 134] Cannot add MARC subfield
by bugzilla-daemon＠wilbur.katipo.co.nz 04 Dec '02

04 Dec '02

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134 a.c.li(a)ieee.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Component|Parameters |Installation ------- Additional Comments From a.c.li(a)ieee.org 2002-12-05 05:53 ------- The value_builder field does not seem to be in scripts/marc/marcschema.sql, which I assume is left as documentation. Should marcschema.sql be updated as well? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 134] Cannot add MARC subfield
by bugzilla-daemon＠wilbur.katipo.co.nz 04 Dec '02

04 Dec '02

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134 ------- Additional Comments From a.c.li(a)ieee.org 2002-12-05 05:50 ------- Created an attachment (id=15) Proposed patch to resolve the problem, by changing the db structure ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 142] New: MARC structure admin does not remember which page the user is working on
by bugzilla-daemon＠wilbur.katipo.co.nz 04 Dec '02

04 Dec '02

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=142 Summary: MARC structure admin does not remember which page the user is working on Product: Koha Version: CVS Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Parameters AssignedTo: tonnesen(a)cmsd.bc.ca ReportedBy: a.c.li(a)ieee.org QAContact: koha-devel(a)lists.sourceforge.net Suppose a librarian is setting up the MARC db structure looking for field "093" (such as the case would be here). He doesn't find it near 090, and decides to "Add New". After defining field 093, Koha displays the list of MARC fields starting at 010. Although the librarian can use the Search function to go back to 093, perhaps he would like to look for more fields near 09x. It might be more convenient if Koha would display the same list as before Add New was done. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 134] Cannot add MARC subfield
by bugzilla-daemon＠wilbur.katipo.co.nz 04 Dec '02

04 Dec '02

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134 a.c.li(a)ieee.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From a.c.li(a)ieee.org 2002-12-05 05:28 ------- This bug is caused by the "value_builder" field being "not null". This is a bug (value_builder should be "null"): (1) David Strainchamps posted on the koha-devel list saying that the DB structure from Paul Poulain have "null" in the last 5 fields (2) "value_builder" has a DEFAULT. In MySQL, DEFAULT values are meaningless unless they can be NULL; it is impossible for DEFAULT and NOT NULL to coexist (even though MySQL won't complain about it). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 134] Cannot add MARC subfield
by bugzilla-daemon＠wilbur.katipo.co.nz 04 Dec '02

04 Dec '02

http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134 a.c.li(a)ieee.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE | ------- Additional Comments From a.c.li(a)ieee.org 2002-12-05 05:25 ------- The SQL error is still there. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0